2 x AMD EPYC 9684X vs. 2 x AMD EPYC 9754 Benchmarks

Add Processor To Compare:

* Note: Due to differences in Linux drivers/interfaces, the reported CPU clock may be displayed different depending upon the CPU - i.e. base vs. boost frequency.
* Disclosure: OpenBenchmarking.org may earn a commission/referral on affiliate shopping links should you decide to make any purchases from the third-party shopping links.

Of the components selected for comparison, there were 432 benchmarks in common (matching test profile, test version and any configurable test options) and where that data was statistically significant and at least three independent data points for each component of the public test results on OpenBenchmarking.org.

2 x AMD EPYC 9684X 96-Core had the most wins, coming in first place for 54% of the tests.

Based on the geometric mean of all complete results, the fastest (2 x AMD EPYC 9684X 96-Core) was 1.063x the speed of the slowest (2 x AMD EPYC 9754 128-Core).

The results with the greatest spread from best to worst included: Stress-NG (Test: Mixed Scheduler) at 4.238x, libxsmm (M N K: 32) at 3.578x, Stress-NG (Test: System V Message Passing) at 3.552x, ONNX Runtime (Model: fcn-resnet101-11 - Device: CPU - Executor: Parallel) at 2.893x, ONNX Runtime (Model: fcn-resnet101-11 - Device: CPU - Executor: Parallel) at 2.889x, Stress-NG (Test: CPU Cache) at 2.414x, OpenVINO (Model: Person Detection FP16 - Device: CPU) at 1.966x, ONNX Runtime (Model: T5 Encoder - Device: CPU - Executor: Standard) at 1.905x, ONNX Runtime (Model: T5 Encoder - Device: CPU - Executor: Standard) at 1.905x, OpenVINO (Model: Person Detection FP32 - Device: CPU) at 1.817x.

432 Benchmarks Found In Common - Sort By: Greatest Spread